Data Loss Risk
Twenty years of student records, financial aid history, and workflows preserved through every migration phase
Whether you're migrating off a legacy ERP or connecting the systems you already have, the risk is the same:
losing data, breaking a process nobody documented, or disrupting a registration cycle.
Every ERP migration story in higher ed involves the same fear: what happens to twenty years of student records, financial aid history, and custom workflows when you move to a new platform. It's not really a technology question. It's an institutional memory question. We treat it that way. That's why every migration starts with a full inventory of what actually needs to move, not just what fits neatly into the new platform. Custom workflows built by someone who left years ago, one-off reports finance depends on, integrations nobody ever documented — we find them before they become the thing that breaks in week two of a new semester.
On the integration side, most institutions aren't trying to replace their ERP, they're trying to get it to actually talk to the other five systems running their campus: the CRM, the LMS, the portal, state reporting tools, and whatever financial aid or advancement platform sits alongside the SIS.
The most common migration failure we see isn't technical. It's a go-live date set by a vendor's project timeline instead of the institution's academic calendar: a cutover scheduled two weeks before fall registration opens. We build migration plans around your institution's calendar first, technology timeline second.
Before anything moves, we spend time mapping what you actually have: every customization, every workaround, every integration nobody wrote down. That assessment becomes the plan, not a generic template applied to your institution. It tells us what's safe to leave alone, what needs to move carefully, and where the real risk sits.
Twenty years of student records, financial aid history, and workflows preserved through every migration phase
CRM, LMS, student portal, and reporting tools that were never built to talk to each other
Go-live dates set by vendor schedules instead of your institution's actual academic calendar and staffing capacity
Custom configurations and workarounds built over years that nobody wrote down before key staff left
Reports and integrations that worked fine in testing but break once real enrollment data hits them